Review Policy (Double Blind Peer Review)

Submissions are accepted for review with the understanding that the same work has been neither submitted to, nor published in, another publication. Simultaneous submission to other publications will result in immediate rejection of the paper. Papers are not within the journal scope will be rejected immediately after the pre review process. Publication Frequency Monthly. All manuscripts will be subject to a well established, fair, unbiased peer blind review and refereeing procedure, and are considered on the basis of their significance, novelty and usefulness to the Journals readership. The reviewing structure will always ensure the anonymity of the referees & it will be reviewed by 2 experts in the field.

The review output will be one of the following decisions:

 1. Accept

 2. Accept with minor changes

3. Weak Accept with major changes

4. Reject

The review process may take approximately 5 to 20 days to be completed. The Editor reserves the right to reject a paper if it does not meet the aims and scope of the journal, it is not revised well. Each manuscript will be primarily examined by the editor, and then forwarded to two referees for blind review. The research paper shall be published subject to recommendation of referees. The review process may take up to  Maximum two months in extra ordinary circumstances.

The author shall be informed about the selection/rejection of the article/paper through paper website or by e-mail. However, the journal shall publish the article/papers of the authors completing the formalities in due time mentioned in the selection letter. The rejected papers shall not be returned.

 In case of acceptance of the article and completion of publication formalities by the author, journal reserves the right of making amendments in the final draft of the research paper to suit the journal's requirement.


We at ARSEAM’S JOURNALS, aspire to select research paper of very high quality in terms of originality, accuracy, validity, reliability, credibility, authority, readability, comprehensibility and relevance to the Journal’s scope and mission which are the outcome of the most recent and original research contributing to the advancement in the existing literature and are very significant in managerial implications. All the papers are selected  through highest quality peer review. To achieve this, the entire peer review and publication process must be thorough, objective, and fair. Almost every aspect of this process involves important ethical principles and decisions, which are rarely explicitly stated and even less often shared with the readership. Journal's reputations depend on the trust of readers, authors, researchers, reviewers, editors and research subjects. This trust is enhanced by describing as explicitly as possible the journal's publication policies to ensure the ethical treatment of all participants in the publication process.  

We have following Publications Guidelines.

Good research should be well justified, well planned, and appropriately designed, so that it can properly address the research question. Paper should publish based on the copyright that constitutes authorship. All authors are responsible for the quality, accuracy, and ethics of the work. Republication of a paper in another language, or simultaneously in multiple journals with different audiences, may be acceptable, provided that there is full and prominent disclosure of its original source at the time of submission of the manuscript.


  • Peer review is fundamental to the scientific publication process and the dissemination of knowledge and information.
  • Peer reviewers should be experts in the specific topic addressed in the articles they review, and should be selected for their objectivity and scientific knowledge.
  • All reviewers should be informed of the publication’s expectations.
  • Reviews will be expected to be professional, honest, courteous, prompt, and constructive.
  • The editors may routinely assess all reviews for quality; they may also edit reviews before sending them to authors.
  • The submitted manuscript is a privileged communication; reviewers must treat it as confidential. It should not be retained or copied.
  • Also, reviewers must not share the manuscript with any colleagues without the explicit permission of the editor.

Editorial Decisions should be precise. If a published paper is subsequently found to have errors or major flaws, the Editor should take responsibility for promptly correcting the written record in the publication. Quality and other performance characteristics of editors should be periodically assessed.

Plagiarism is the use of other's published and unpublished ideas or words (or other intellectual property) without attribution or permission, and presenting them as new and original rather than derived from an existing source.  We at ARSEAM’S JOURNALS,  strongly discourage and against this ruthless act. If found guilty, to any extent, ARSEAM’S JOURNALS  will fight for Plagiarism. Self-plagiarism refers to the practice of an author using portions of their previous writings on the same topic in another of their publications, without specifically citing it formally in quotes.