Arseam

GUIDELINES FOR EDITORS

Academic Editors at ACADRES assess the scope and quality of each submitted manuscript and make a recommendation based on feedback from peer reviewers. Editorial Boards are collectively responsible for ensuring that the journal publishes high-quality research that falls within its scope and objectives.

DUTIES OF EDITORS

Decision on the Publication of Articles: The Editor-in-chief (EIC) of the Journal is responsible to make the decision regarding publication of submitted articles. The EIC may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and subjected to such legal requirements. The Editor is authorized to carry out the decision in consultation with reviewers, Managing Editor and editorial board members.
Fair play: The manuscripts should be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit without regard to authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.
Confidentiality: The Editor and editorial staff must not disclose any information about a manuscript that is submitted to the journal to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. The editor must ensure the integrity of double-blind peer-review and should not disclose the identity of the reviewers to the authors of that manuscript, and vice versa.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by editor or reviewer or anyone else who has a view of the manuscript while handling it in his or her own research without the express written consent of the author.
Complaints & Misconduct: Misconduct and unethical behaviour may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone. Whoever informs the editor or publisher of such conduct must provide all the information needed for the investigation to be initiated. All allegations should be taken seriously and treated in the same way, until a successful decision or conclusion is reached. Editorial board members must guarantee prompt responses to the complainants by taking action and correcting the signalled errors. Evidence should be gathered, while avoiding spreading any allegations beyond those who need to know.

We recommend that you also read COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors

https://publicationethics.org/files/u2/Best_Practice.pdf

Aims and Objectives

Ethics Policy

Peer Review Policy

Call for Paper

Conference

Instruction To Review

Guide To Authors