Arseam

AUTHOR’S PRIVACY POLICY

All journal submissions are double blind, peer reviewed by members of the Editorial Board. First, the journal Editor reviews papers for appropriateness, and uses a plagiarism verification tool to ensure the work has not been plagiarized. Then the Editor sends out the manuscript to two reviewers, without disclosing the identities of the authors or other reviewer. The review results are confidentially delivered to the Editor, who then reviews the reviewer feedback to ensure the comments are relevant and non-discriminatory before sending the comments back to the authors. Authors are given a chance to make revisions to their manuscripts based on the feedback they receive. Revised papers are sent back to the Editors who send the revised paper back to the original reviewers. Feedback from the second round of reviews is processed in the same way. In rare cases, authors are given a second chance to revise and resubmit their papers if they are not found acceptable after the first revision.

During all the process from receiving the paper to paper acceptance/rejection, the identities of the authors are not disclosed to reviewers or editors. The names and email addresses entered anywhere on the ACADRES website will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of the specified journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Aims and Objectives

Ethics Policy

Peer Review Policy

Call for Paper

Conference

Instruction To Review

Guide To Authors